WHO: COVID origins unclear but lab leak theory needs study

LONDON — An skilled group drafted by the World Health Organization to assist examine the origins of the coronavirus pandemic says additional analysis is required to find out how COVID-19 first started, together with a extra detailed evaluation of the chance it was a laboratory accident.

That stance marks a pointy reversal of the U.N. well being company’s preliminary evaluation of the pandemic’s origins, when it concluded final year that it was “extremely unlikely” that COVID-19 might need spilled into people from a lab.

In a report launched Thursday, WHO’s skilled group stated “key pieces of data” are nonetheless lacking to clarify how the pandemic started. The scientists stated the group would “remain open to any and all scientific evidence that becomes available in the future to allow for comprehensive testing of all reasonable hypotheses.”

It famous that since lab accidents up to now have triggered some outbreaks, the extremely politicized theory couldn’t be discounted.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speculated repeatedly — with out proof — that COVID-19 was began in a Chinese lab. He additionally accused WHO of “colluding” with China to cover up the preliminary outbreak, citing the U.N. well being company’s continued public reward of the nation.

WHO’s skilled group stated WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus despatched two letters to senior Chinese authorities officers in February requesting data together with particulars in regards to the earliest human instances of COVID-19 within the metropolis of Wuhan. The specialists stated no research had been offered to WHO that assessed the potential of COVID-19 being a laboratory leak. They stated their understanding of how the coronavirus emerged was restricted by elements together with that not all analysis introduced by Chinese scientists on the virus has been revealed.

The scientists stated quite a few avenues of analysis had been wanted, together with research evaluating the position of untamed animals, that are considered COVID-19’s pure reservoir, and environmental research in locations the place the virus might need first unfold, just like the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan.

Last March, WHO launched a report about COVID-19’s origins following a extremely choreographed go to by worldwide scientists to China, which concluded that the illness almost definitely jumped into people from bats and that there was no proof to counsel there was a connection to a laboratory.

Yet after appreciable criticism, together with from a few of the scientists on WHO’s workforce, Tedros acknowledged that it was “ premature ” to rule out a lab leak and stated he has requested China to be extra clear in sharing data.

In its new report, WHO stated they got entry to information together with from unpublished blood samples from greater than 40,000 folks in Wuhan in 2019, which had been examined for COVID-19 antibodies. None had been discovered, suggesting the virus was not spreading extensively earlier than it was first recognized in late December that year.

WHO’s specialists referred to as for quite a few research to be performed, together with testing wild animals to seek out which species would possibly host COVID-19. They additionally stated the “cold chain” provide theory ought to be probed — a scientifically questionable theory that China has superior, arguing that traces of COVID-19 on frozen packaging was inflicting outbreaks relatively than any home supply.

To examine whether or not COVID-19 might need been the results of a lab accident, WHO’s specialists stated analysis ought to be performed “with the staff in the laboratories tasked with managing and implementing biosafety and biosecurity,” saying that would offer extra details about how viruses associated to COVID-19 had been managed.

China has beforehand referred to as the suggestion that COVID-19 started in a laboratory “ baseless ” and countered that the virus might need originated in American amenities, which had been additionally recognized to be researching coronaviruses in animals. The Chinese authorities has stated it helps the seek for the pandemic’s origins, but that different nations ought to be the main focus.

Last August, scientists related to WHO lamented that the seek for the pandemic’s origins had stalled and that the window of alternative was “closing fast.” They warned that amassing information that was now not less than two years outdated was more and more troublesome.

Numerous public well being skilled s have referred to as for a world fee to research COVID-19’s origins, saying that WHO lacks each the political authority and the independence to find out how the pandemic began.


Follow AP’s protection of the pandemic at

Back to top button