Politics

What To Expect From The Second Public Jan. 6 Committee Hearing

The House choose committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol will maintain a second public listening to at 10 a.m. ET Monday because it continues to current its findings associated to former President Donald Trump’s position within the violence that day.

The first listening to aired for 2 hours on prime-time tv on Thursday and drew 20 million viewers. All broadcast and cable information networks besides Fox News carried the listening to dwell.

The committee has six public hearings deliberate in whole, and a minimum of yet one more can be throughout prime time.

During the primary listening to, the committee launched never-before-seen video of the violence and confirmed testimony from former Attorney General William Barr and Ivanka Trump, Trump’s daughter and former White House adviser.

Trump responded to the primary listening to with a barrage of messages on his Truth Social app, his fundamental technique of speaking with supporters since he was banned from Twitter for spreading election falsehoods.

You can catch up right here on the massive moments you may need missed from the primary listening to. Here’s what to anticipate from the subsequent spherical:

The focus of the listening to can be that Trump and his allies knew he lost however pushed election fraud lies anyway

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the committee’s vice chair, stated final week that the second hearing will show that Trump and his advisers knew he lost the election to President Joe Biden, however that, regardless of this, Trump “engaged in a massive effort to spread false and fraudulent information to convince huge portions of the U.S. population that fraud had stolen the election from him.”

Barr’s testimony aired Thursday already touched on this level. Barr stated he instructed Trump his claims round election fraud had been “bullshit” and that he didn’t agree with the concept of claiming the election was stolen.

We can anticipate extra testimony and findings from individuals in Trump’s orbit saying they instructed him he had lost the election and there was no proof to help Trump’s allegations.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) stated Sunday that the committee might “prove to any reasonable, open-minded person that Donald Trump absolutely knew” he lost.

“Any reasonable person in America will tell you, he had to have known he was spreading a big lie, and he continues to spread it to this very day,” Raskin instructed CNN.

Conservative Republican election lawyer Ben Ginsberg will reportedly testify there was no proof of widespread fraud

In this June 23, 2012, file photo, campaign counsel Ben Ginsberg walks at a private donors' conference for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at The Chateaux at Silver Lake at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah.
In this June 23, 2012, file picture, marketing campaign counsel Ben Ginsberg walks at a non-public donors’ convention for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at The Chateaux at Silver Lake at Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah.

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File

Ben Ginsberg, a Republican lawyer who is taken into account an professional on elections, will testify there was no proof of widespread fraud within the 2020 election, (*6*). He can even testify on the various failed authorized challenges by Trump’s workforce.

CNN cited sources on Ginsberg’s testimony, because the committee investigating Jan. 6 hasn’t publicly launched the names of these testifying.

Ginsberg performed a vital position within the 2000 presidential recount and defeat of Al Gore to George W. Bush.

He additionally criticized Trump in a November 2020 opinion piece in The Washington Post, saying Trump had launched an “all-out, multimillion-dollar effort to disenfranchise voters.”

It will embody testimony from Chris Stirewalt, a fired Fox News editor who known as Arizona for Biden

Chris Stirewalt, a former Fox News political editor, is ready to testify Monday.

While Stirewalt said he couldn’t discuss exactly what his testimony can be, it ought to be associated to the committee’s theme of what Trump and his workforce knew versus how they acted.

Stirewalt was fired from the community in January 2021 after receiving right-wing backlash to his choice to name Arizona for Biden on election night time 2020, which reportedly infuriated Trump.

Stirewalt defended his choice in an editorial in the Los Angeles Times in January 2021 and criticized American media. “Having been cosseted by self-validating coverage for so long, many Americans now consider any news that might suggest that they are in error or that their side has been defeated as an attack on them personally,” he wrote.

While the primary listening to supplied an summary, we’ll get extra particulars within the second and subsequent hearings

Committee member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) on Sunday touched on the quantity of misinformation that flooded the zone across the time of the Jan. 6 assault and continues to be pervasive.

Kinzinger stated Thursday’s listening to was meant to be a top-line have a look at what occurred. He additionally responded to Trump’s declare that the president tried to achieve out to the National Guard through the violence after testimony confirmed then-Vice President Mike Pence needed to bounce in when the president wouldn’t.

“I think it’s very obvious that the president didn’t do anything but gleefully watch television when this was going down,” Kinzinger instructed CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Back to top button