UC Irvine professor spent $400,000 of state funds on cameras used for Instagram posts

Yi-hong Zhou was working as a analysis scientist at UC Irvine’s medical faculty in April 2014 when she acquired an odd question from the college’s gear managers: Could she affirm she was utilizing a $53,000 digital camera in her lab?

Zhou replied that she’d by no means seen such a digital camera and didn’t perceive why the division of neurological surgical procedure would wish something of the sort. She didn’t obtain a lot of an answer, she recalled.

But 5 years later, the circumstances behind the curious electronic mail snapped into focus when one other division member met Zhou in a car parking zone and handed her a buying bag stuffed with receipts detailing the purchases of greater than $400,000 in images gear, together with 14 cameras and 46 lenses. All had been bought by Frank P.Okay. Hsu, the division’s chair.

An audit launched in response to Zhou’s subsequent whistleblower report concluded that Hsu, who makes $1.2 million a year, bought the digital camera gear with college funds, usually utilizing “suspicious” or “unauthorized” means, in line with the auditors’ report.

The auditors found that Hsu had a personal web site on which he had tons of of photographs for sale, some priced at tons of of {dollars}.

But the report remained sealed, away from public view, till Zhou contacted The Times and a reporter requested directors in regards to the consequence of their investigation. It was solely after the college offered a replica to The Times that Zhou herself was in a position to learn it.

Hsu declined to talk to The Times or answer questions.

Tom Vasich, a UCI spokesman, stated Hsu had now repaid the college $404,000 — the worth of purchases questioned by the auditors.

“The university took appropriate corrective measures,” Vasich stated.

Two consultants questioned whether or not the college‘s response was sufficient.

If the same unauthorized purchases had happened at a private company, said Michael Josephson, head of the Josephson Institute of Ethics in Playa del Rey, the employee “almost certainly would be fired.”

“When the consequences are nothing more than, ‘Oh, you got caught so say you’re sorry and provides it again,’” Josephson stated, “it sends the wrong message.”

“The consequences should be significant enough that somebody in a similar situation would say it’s not worth it,” he stated.

Liz Hempowicz, an skilled on whistleblower protections on the Project on Government Oversight, stated directors ought to have regarded into the purchases when Zhou first raised questions with directors in regards to the lacking $53,000 digital camera in 2014.

“When you get away with something once, it becomes much easier to keep doing it if you think nobody’s paying attention,” she stated.

Zhou labored within the division from 2006 till late 2013, focusing on analysis into brain tumors. She then moved to the division of basic surgical procedure, persevering with to work in her lab.

She too believes that Hsu ought to have confronted extra critical penalties in gentle of the auditors’ findings. In her view, Hsu’s actions increase questions on his judgment and his health to care for sufferers or train UCI’s medical college students.

“He used state funds as his piggy bank,” she stated. “He is setting a bad example for these future doctors.”

Hsu’s said motive for buying the images gear was to create a multimedia middle for use in coaching residents and group outreach. He informed the auditors that when he was employed to guide the neurological surgical procedure division in 2012 he acquired verbal authorization from the dean to create the media lab, including that the provide excited him as a result of he was an avid beginner photographer.

The auditors requested Hsu why he had bought so many cameras and lenses for a media lab that was not but operational. He informed them that every buy had “a specific business purpose.”

In their report, the auditors famous that no media lab ever materialized. They concluded that Hsu “could not reasonably explain or provide a business purpose for the extraordinary amount of expensive cameras.”

The dean who employed Hsu, in addition to the medical faculty’s present dean, each informed the auditors that they “had no knowledge” of a neurosurgery media lab, the report stated.

After studying Hsu’s rationalization within the auditors’ report, Zhou famous that greater than $100,000 of the gear was shipped on to Hsu’s Irvine residence and that he had posted dozens of photographs on Instagram exhibiting him utilizing the cameras on holidays and personal picture shoots, comparable to one exhibiting a feminine mannequin stress-free on a sofa with a cocktail.

Asked whether or not the college had taken every other motion towards Hsu past the repayments, Vasich stated he couldn’t talk about personnel points as a result of of privateness legal guidelines.

“None of these policy violations has had any impact on Dr. Hsu’s surgical practice,” he stated.

Hsu initially informed the auditors that he didn’t have a images business, the report stated. He later modified his story, acknowledging that he was promoting photographs, however stated he “does not sell much” and that “it was just for fun.”

University of California coverage states that workers can not use college resources for non-public achieve.

Josephson stated he believed it was “outrageous” that the college had not completed extra to make sure its professor was not misusing funds.

Zhou, who’s now retired from the college, stated she want to know why the dean’s office didn’t cease the purchases when she first raised questions in 2014. In working her lab, she stated, she was required to get approval from the dean’s office for any buy of $20,000 or extra. She famous that Hsu made 5 purchases of cameras that exceeded that quantity.

According to her paperwork, Hsu’s purchases started in 2012, shortly after he was employed.

Zhou stated she had grown annoyed in recent times as she repeatedly requested UCI directors how they’d dealt with the detailed proof she had offered in her whistleblower criticism.

In August 2020, a UCI worker in cost of investigating the complaints despatched a letter, saying that auditors discovered the purchases violated college coverage and that the case had been referred to administration. Then there was silence.

Vasich stated there was no requirement that the dean’s office approve purchases of $20,000 or extra when Hsu purchased the cameras.

Despite the deans telling auditors that they’d no recollection of approving the media lab, the division has since moved forward with it. Vasich stated the media lab not too long ago turned operational.

Until Hsu took down many of the photographs, his Instagram account confirmed him utilizing the cameras on journeys to international locations together with Japan, Australia and Italy, in addition to on the seaside in Crystal Cove State Park.

In 2015, a Reuters journalist took a photograph of Hsu in Paris, exterior Notre Dame, with a digital camera slung throughout his shoulder. The strap was emblazoned with the brand Phase One — the digital camera model of 4 of his most costly purchases.

The journalist requested Hsu that day whether or not the strengthening U.S. greenback towards the euro had made a distinction to his journey. He answered that it had made him wish to spend extra money.

Back to top button