Technology

‘The Last of Us Part I’ directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether or not The Last of Us Part I is value the $70 asking worth, the question surrounding this remake is how a lot the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog deal with this as a complete do-over, altering the degree design, gameplay mechanics and participant upgrades? It has turn into apparent over the previous couple of weeks, as Sony launched a handful of preview movies forward of at this time’s launch, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the objective was to deliver massively up to date visuals and a number of quality-of-life enhancements to a game that will in any other case keep true to its roots.

“This is a unique project for Naughty Dog. It’s the first time we’ve taken on a full remake,” stated inventive director Shaun Escayg in an interview. “We knew that we wanted to stay true to the original game as closely as possible, [to] add what we think will heighten and enhance the experience but not fundamentally change the experience.” That mindset permeates the game, from every part you possibly can see in the setting down to the battles in opposition to each people and the Infected.

“We didn’t feel like these combat encounters were dated and there wasn’t really anything we were looking at saying ‘we want a do-over here,’” added game director Matthew Gallant. “We love the combat in The Last of Us. We think those spaces are really iconic: They’re really strong, they afford a ton of different options for moving around and fighting. What often was dated was perhaps the technology underlying some of these fights.”

Gallant, who was a fight designer on the original The Last of Us, says the game might solely deal with eight AI “brains” at any given time, regardless of fights that always had extra enemies than that. This meant that they’d to reactivate and deactivate these brains primarily based on the place the character was and what they had been doing. Similarly, he described rather a lot of the battles in the original game as “hand scripted.” “You move here, they react by doing this; that was just the level of technology that we had at the time and it was what made sense, and we got pretty good results,” he stated. “Those are really great fights, and they hold up really well. But with our latest engine technology we can be a lot more flexible.”

The new AI, unsurprisingly, is way extra superior. “We have the option to use information in the [level] layout to tell enemies ‘this is a strong position to defend, this is a good flanking route, this is a good line of sight to other enemies, and there’s an encounter manager layer that’s assigning NPCs to roles within the fight,” Gallant stated. “Who would be the best flanker right now, who would be the best person to defend this point, who should be pushing up on the player right now?” In my expertise so far, the finish result’s a game that’s far much less predictable than the original – in case you get caught out of stealth, enemies advance shortly and mercilessly, particularly on tougher problem ranges. “You should be able to play a fight ten different ways and get ten different results,” he added.

Gallery: ‘The Last of Us Part I’ overview screenshots | 21 Photos


Another huge question round fight was why Naughty Dog didn’t add some of the new mechanics it in-built The Last of Us Part II from 2020. In that game, gamers management Ellie and Abby, each of whom can lie on the floor to disguise in grass or crawl underneath automobiles for cover. They can even dodge, a function that added an entire new dimension to fights, supplying you with an out when a Clicker or Bloater is bearing down on you for a one-hit prompt kill.

According to Gallant, the ripple results of including dodge to the original game would have been too important. “Dodge isn’t something that lives in a vacuum,” he stated. “You have to add tells to the enemy attacks, and now the enemies are going to be attacking differently. You also may need to change the encounter spaces; you need to give a little more room to have that dodge gameplay.” Beyond that, including dodge would diminish the pressure that Naughty Dog tried to infuse in the game’s battles.

“If you have dodge, you kind of have an out. Then all of a sudden, a fight that was very claustrophobic and tense and nerve-wracking – this thing’s bearing down on you and you have to land that headshot to kill it – you get a very different sensation if you have dodge,” Gallant stated.

But most significantly, in accordance to Gallant, taking part in as Joel basically wants to really feel totally different than taking part in as Ellie, and simply porting over her strikes would diminish these variations. “The way Joel plays tells you a lot about his character,” he stated. “He is a bruiser, he’s a brawler, he’s an older man. The way that he fights is supposed to feel very different than the way Ellie fights in The Last of Us Part II. She’s a younger woman, she’s nimble, she has a whole skill set that’s very different.” Fans can proceed to argue about whether or not Naughty Dog ought to have gone additional with the adjustments it made to gameplay, nevertheless it’s additionally cheap that they need to hold the characters in Part I distinct from these in Part II.

While it would take gamers a while to acknowledge the extent of the AI updates, the graphical enhancements are instantly apparent. For me, the most hanging change is the facial animations, however the extent to which Naughty Dog went in and checked out each facet of a scene to enhance it’s equally spectacular. For instance, as Joel and Ellie make their means by the suburbs of Pittsburgh with new companions Henry and his teenage brother Sam, Ellie and Sam take a break on a sofa in a ruined home. From trying again at previous screenshots, I noticed that the sofa was completely redesigned. Why not simply use the original sofa design?

“We’re trying to update everything with the decade of artistic development and improvement in technology since the PlayStation 3,” Escayg defined. “Is this the most grounded-looking couch? Can it stand up in this environment? How does it wear and tear over time? How does it work with the lighting and the time of day in that setting? Does it actually focus your attention on Sam and Ellie, or does it detract?”

Gallery: Comparison between ‘The Last of Us Remastered’ (PS4) and ‘The Last of Us Part I’ (PS5) | 12 Photos


Speaking extra broadly, Escayg notes that Naughty Dog went by hundreds of “micro decisions” throughout the total game. “Does anything distract? Let’s remove it,” he stated. “Do we absolutely need it? Are fans really attached to it? Are we really attached to it?”

Gallant says that rather a lot of the re-evaluation that Naughty Dog did targeted on why it designed sections of the game the means they did a decade in the past. “This area is plain — is it plain because we want you to kind of move through it and it’s meant to be unremarkable, or is it plain because we were low on memory on the PlayStation 3 and this was kind of a transition area from one detailed area to a next one?”

Naughty Dog did make one main addition that may basically change how The Last of Us Part I performs. There are actually myriad accessibility choices, none of which had been current in both the PS3 game or the PS4 remaster. The function set contains every part the developer put into Part II in 2020, together with a couple of new additions. Despite the proven fact that the game wasn’t initially designed with accessibility in thoughts, Gallant says that it was comparatively simple to deliver these options over – although some of the extra distinctive scenes in the game had been harder to account for.

“One example is the arcade mini-game in Left Behind,” Gallant stated. The mini-game in question requires you to make a selected collection of directional and button presses in a restricted quantity of time, such as you do in Street Fighter II or Mortal Kombat. “We needed to design our text-to-speech there to tell you the instructions of what buttons to put in very quickly so you have time to put in the inputs. We worked with accessibility consultants and they tried some various revisions of that mini game. We did a couple rounds there to make sure that experience was accessible.”

The PS5’s DualSense controller and its intensive haptics system opened up one of these new accessibility choices, dialog haptics. “This is a feature where we play the spoken dialog as vibrations on the controller,” Gallant defined, “and the intent there is to give deaf players a sense of how the line was delivered. Where was the emphasis, what was the cadence? And that along with the subtitles provides more of that story context and the performance to deaf players as well.”

Back to top button