San Antonio

State rests in case against Barrientes Vela, but not before fiery cross-examination of Texas Ranger

SAN ANTONIO – The prosecution rested its case Wednesday afternoon in the general public corruption trial of Michelle Barrientes Vela, capping off seven days of testimony that ranged from methodical to explosive and included a mistrial almost being declared.

Attorneys for Barrientes Vela indicated they are going to relaxation their case on Thursday morning, which units the stage for closing arguments and deliberations to happen that very same day in Judge Velia Meza’s courtoom.

Barrientes Vela, whose scandal-plagued 33 months in office was hampered by allegations of felony wrongdoing and mistreatment of the general public and her personal deputies, is accused of tampering with safety information from Rodriguez Park.

She faces as much as 10 years in jail if convicted.

Defense legal professional Nico LaHood continued his aggressive cross-examination of Texas Ranger Bradley Freeman, whose utterance Tuesday that he believed Barrientes Vela had dedicated official oppression almost led to a mistrial being declared by Meza.


Barrientes Vela faces a number of counts of official oppression, but these expenses are not half of this trial, and Meza has repeatedly said that allegations of wrongdoing against Barrientes Vela not associated to her tampering expenses are off limits.

Meza denied the protection’s movement for mistrial late Tuesday afternoon but directed her workers to start contempt of courtroom proceedings against Freeman.

Those will happen at a later date, Meza stated.

WATCH: Highlights from Day 7 of the Michelle Barrientes Vela trial

Here’s a condensed model of what went down on Day 7 of the Michelle Barrientes Vela trial.

LaHood took goal at Freeman’s failure to request money logs particularly in any of the a number of grand jury subpoenas issued to Barrientes Vela in the summer season of 2019.


LaHood additionally questioned whether or not Freeman correctly scrutinized the star witness in the state’s case: former Precinct 2 clerk Susan Tristan.

“We trusted that Susan would tell us if there was anything on the recording that we needed to know. We trusted her. We felt that she was being honest,” stated Freeman, when describing tapes made by a covert FBI recording system worn by Tristan at work for a number of days in the summer season of 2019.

LaHood responded, “That’s amazing.”

Freeman confirmed he by no means listened to the total contents of the recordings and as an alternative had finished “spot listening” of them.

Tristan did not report Barrientes Vela saying something incriminating whereas Tristan wore the system.

Barrientes Vela’s attorneys tried to cast Tristan in a adverse gentle for a lot of Wednesday, describing her as a clerk who had gotten into hassle for shredding safety information from the identical West Side park and as somebody who was on her method out.


Tristan resigned from Precinct 2 in late September 2019, a day after the Rangers and FBI raided Barrientes Vela’s Northwest Side workplaces, and accepted an identical position in the Seattle space.

After LaHood argued that Freeman’s 94-page report on Barrientes Vela did not embrace “evidence of innocence,” prosecutor Dawn McCraw identified that regulation enforcement stories are about proof of wrongdoing and the way that proof comes collectively.

The prosecution rested its case round 3:30 p.m. Thursday.

The protection can start presenting its case round 10:30 a.m. Thursday, but indicated Wednesday afternoon that it plans to as an alternative relaxation its case.

Copyright 2022 by KSAT – All rights reserved.

Back to top button