R. Kelly’s attorney wants any would-be jurors who’ve seen ‘Surviving R. Kelly’ docu-series removed

Jury choice in R. Kelly’s federal trial in Chicago acquired underway Monday with the choose questioning 30 potential jurors about what they know concerning the indicted R&B star and the fees towards him.

Shortly earlier than court docket started, Kelly, wearing a grey go well with and tan shirt, was introduced into the massive ceremonial courtroom on the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse and took his seat at a crowded protection desk, leaning over at occasions to whisper by a face protecting to his attorneys.

Potential jurors’ identities are being shielded from the general public through the proceedings, and little or no was revealed about them as U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber requested every particular person to make clear solutions they gave on a written questionnaire.

One by one, the choose questioned 30 individuals earlier than he introduced a lunch break round 1 p.m. Of these, 16 have been dismissed, most of whom reported they’d have hassle being neutral to Kelly or his co-defendants.

“Thinking about the case and the charges over the weekend, I no longer firmly believe that I can be unbiased,” one girl stated on the outset of the questioning. Leinenweber promptly excused her.

Another girl stated she went to Tae Kwon Do lessons with Kelly’s kids years in the past, and the expertise may maintain her from being unbiased.

Another girl stated her job entails advocating for youngsters.

“I would do my best to be fair, be impartial. My only concern would be the defensiveness side kicking in, perhaps,” she stated earlier than Leinenweber excused her.

Some questioning revolved across the “Surviving R. Kelly” docuseries, which many potential jurors stated they’d watched or had at the least heard of it.

One girl stated she noticed the entire thing, however it might not have an effect on her potential to be truthful — prompting some audible snickers from a couple of Kelly supporters watching from the courtroom gallery.

.Another man stated he watched a part of an episode along with his spouse however didn’t bear in mind something substantive about it.

“I think I might have even fallen asleep before the end of it,” he stated.

It stays to be seen which of the opposite potential jurors who have been questioned Monday will finally make it on to the panel. Leinenweber stated he wished a pool of at the least 40 earlier than transferring to the following section, when each prosecutors and protection attorneys will use their peremptory strikes to additional weed out the panel.

Before jury choice started round 10:45 a.m., Leinenweber sped by a slew of pretrial selections, ruling in favor of prosecutors on a number of high-profile requests.

The choose denied Kelly co-defendant Derrel McDavid’s request for extra information a couple of former Kelly prosecutor’s communications with a key witness and Jim DeRogatis. He additionally rejected McDavid’s arguments that prosecutors botched the chain of custody on a key video, saying a witness is anticipated to vouch for its authenticity underneath oath.

He additionally granted prosecutors’ movement to exclude testimony from a health care provider about Kelly’s low IQ; Kelly’s attorneys then stated for the file they’d determined towards calling the physician at trial anyway.

Leinenweber additionally denied a protection request to reject any jurors who had seen any a part of Lifetime’s “Surviving R. Kelly” docuseries. Kelly’s attorneys had argued that anybody who had seen any a part of the sequence couldn’t be truthful.

Leinenweber, nonetheless, stated a blanket rejection of anybody who had seen any a part of the present wouldn’t be acceptable.

Apparently Leinenweber had selected most of the requests at a listening to final week that by no means hit the general public docket. Leinenweber’s rulings additionally weren’t made a part of the general public file till he learn them from the bench Monday morning.

In a movement filed Sunday, Kelly’s attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, wrote that the potential pitfalls over the sequence, which particulars years of sexual misconduct allegations towards the Chicago-born R&B singer, go far past the same old issues over jurors being uncovered to destructive pretrial publicity.

“This is an issue of potential jurors possessing a mountain of information about the specific allegations in this case and the witnesses’ stories that will play center stage at this trial and may or may not be admissible,” Bonjean wrote. “Allowing an individual to sit on this jury who has seen ‘Surviving R. Kelly’ is no different than allowing a juror to sit on the jury who was permitted to preview the discovery in this case.”

A pool of about 100 potential jurors got here to the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse final week to fill out questionnaires, together with their ideas concerning the high-profile defendant, who was sentenced in June to 30 years in jail on federal racketeering expenses introduced in New York.

In her movement, Bonjean revealed that some members of the jury pool indicated on their types that they’d seen “Surviving R. Kelly” and couldn’t be truthful to Kelly. Others stated they may nonetheless be neutral regardless of being uncovered to at the least a few of sequence — a illustration that Bonjean stated was “absurd.”

Kelly, 55, was charged with little one pornography and obstruction of justice in a 2019 indictment alleging he conspired with others to rig his Cook County trial years in the past by paying off a teenage lady whom he sexually assaulted on a now-infamous videotape.

Also going through trial are Kelly’s former business supervisor, Derrel McDavid, and one other affiliate, Milton “June” Brown, who, in response to the indictment, schemed to purchase again incriminating intercourse tapes that had been taken from Kelly’s assortment and conceal years of alleged sexual abuse of underage women.

U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber is ready to start questioning jurors at 10 a.m. within the massive ceremonial courtroom on the twenty fifth Floor of the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse. The trial is anticipated to final at the least 4 weeks.

Though Kelly is already going through what may very well be the remainder of his life behind bars, the trial about to unfold in Chicago appears ripe for intrigue.

For one, Kelly’s attorney, Bonjean, is a veteran litigator who relishes taking over what she portrays as an unchecked and overzealous authorities, representing controversial shoppers reminiscent of actor Bill Cosby and Gangster Disciples boss Larry Hoover. Brown’s lawyer, Mary Judge, can also be well-respected and a 25-year veteran of the Federal Public Defender’s Office in Chicago.

McDavid, in the meantime, is represented by Chicago attorneys Beau Brindley and Vadim Glozman, who’ve proven in a flurry of pretrial motions that they intend to aggressively combat the fees, even when it means doubtlessly throwing Kelly underneath the bus.

And in an added twist, Brindley himself was acquitted by Leinenweber seven years in the past of felony expenses alleging he’d coached shoppers to lie on the witness stand — a case that the Tribune first reported when the FBI raided Brindley’s office within the famed Monadnock Building throughout the road from Chicago’s federal courthouse.

The attorney who defended Brindley in that case, the late Edward Genson, was Kelly’s lead attorney in his 2008 little one pornography trial.

Leinenweber, 85, is among the senior statesmen of Chicago’s federal bench, with a well-worn popularity for equity, an acute data of the legislation and a reasonably low tolerance for nonsense.

However the proof shakes out, Kelly’s trial is probably the most high-profile occasion on the sometimes buttoned-down Dirksen U.S. Courthouse within the 2 ½ years for the reason that onset of the pandemic.

Kelly’s die-hard followers — some who live-tweet occasions in his case and publish social media movies that garner tens of millions of views — are anticipated to point out up in droves to help him, identical to they did at his first Cook County trial and his Brooklyn trial.

Afternoon Briefing

Afternoon Briefing


Chicago Tribune editors’ high story picks, delivered to your inbox every afternoon.

And the scene may very well be simply as theatrical contained in the courtroom. Recent weeks have seen a flood of pretrial motions, every seemingly extra bombastic than the final.

Prosecutors wish to bar Kelly’s protection from presenting professional testimony that Kelly has an IQ of about 79, saying his alleged mental deficiencies are irrelevant as to if he videotaped himself molesting underage women. Kelly’s protection wants to ban prosecutors from calling an professional witness to testify about little one intercourse abuse and grooming.

Most dramatically, maybe, McDavid’s authorized group has argued in a sequence of strongly worded motions that prosecutors botched the chain of custody for the important thing videotape within the case, during which Kelly allegedly sexually assaulted his then-13-yer-old goddaughter, recognized within the expenses solely as Minor 1.

The protection has additionally accused the previous lead prosecutor on the case, Angel Krull, of getting inappropriate contact with Minor 1, who’s now in her mid-30s, in addition to Jim DeRogatis, the Chicago journalist whose reporting a long time in the past was the primary to convey the accusations towards Kelly to gentle.

DeRogotis has been subpoenaed as a possible witness for the protection.

As of Sunday night, Leinenweber had made no rulings on the pending requests.

Back to top button