Chicago

R. Kelly co-defendant to take the stand for cross-examination

On the third straight day of testimony from R. Kelly’s co-defendant and former business supervisor, prosecutors sought to painting him as an excessive amount of of an insider to ever have been blind to Kelly’s true actions — and indicated that he had a major monetary curiosity in ensuring Kelly’s repute stayed clear.

Derrel McDavid knew about the lawsuits alleging Kelly’s sexual misconduct however merely wished “to pay (the claimants) off, to just give them money, to make them go away,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeannice Appenteng asserted.

“It wasn’t about getting to the truth of the matter, right?” she requested.

McDavid responded that she was misstating his testimony.

“It was about protecting your boss and protecting your pocket,” Appenteng asserted.

“No, ma’am,” McDavid stated. “It was not about my pocket.”

McDavid and Kelly face federal costs alleging they hid proof displaying Kelly sexually abused his goddaughter. McDavid has made the uncommon — and considerably dangerous — determination to testify in his personal protection. His marathon testimony started Wednesday morning and will proceed all day Friday.

McDavid has repeatedly stated he had no cause to consider Kelly was concerned in wrongdoing in the late Nineteen Nineties and 2000s, when Kelly was repeatedly accused of sexually abusing underage women. McDavid testified that at the time of Kelly’s 2008 Cook County trial, he believed the tape at the heart of the costs was phony, and that Kelly was continuously extorted by liars who had been out for a payday.

McDavid’s protection relies upon largely on the declare he believed Kelly was really harmless throughout the time interval of the alleged cover-ups, and that he solely ever acted at the behest of all the legal professionals and investigators he employed.

On prosecutors’ cross-examination, they famous that the fundamental legal professionals and investigator who McDavid stated knowledgeable his views on Kelly’s innocence are all now useless.

“So you are the only one left to describe what was said and what was not said during those conversations, is that right?” Appenteng requested. McDavid answered no.

McDavid confirmed, nonetheless, that he made a major quantity of money managing Kelly’s affairs earlier than the two males had an expert falling-out round 2013.

McDavid has been considerably contentious on the stand, telling the prosecutor repeatedly that he thought she was misrepresenting his earlier testimony in her questions. Several instances, he’s had a confused expression cross his face, opened his mouth and closed it, earlier than saying, “I don’t recall.”

At one level, when requested about how a lot he’d earned in commissions from Kelly’s firms throughout a selected year, McDavid requested Appenteng if she might whole it.

“You’re the accountant. Can you total it?” she joked, prompting jurors and spectators to burst into laughter.

McDavid threw his fingers up and smiled, saying, “I don’t have a calculator.”

Appenteng famous that McDavid beforehand stated he didn’t consider Kelly’s accusers partially as a result of they didn’t go to police with their claims. But, she famous, McDavid by no means referred to as regulation enforcement when he thought Kelly was being stolen from or extorted by folks like prosecution witness Charles Freeman.

“You didn’t call the police on Charles Freeman for his extortion attempt? You didn’t want police to see that tape, the tape that contained child pornography, right?”

“No ma’am,” McDavid responded. McDavid once more repeatedly claimed he didn’t see any of the video that Kelly’s staff recovered.

In a very testy trade, prosecutors additionally pressed McDavid on whether or not he was actually absent for a vital meeting at an Oak Park resort.

Kelly’s goddaughter, recognized in the trial as “Jane,” has beforehand testified that at that meeting, Kelly instructed her mother and father about their sexual contact. Jane stated she couldn’t recall whether or not McDavid was current. However, her mom “Susan” testified McDavid was there, however stated Kelly didn’t make any admissions of wrongdoing.

McDavid on Friday strenuously denied being current for that meeting, a declare prosecutors sought to cast doubt on. McDavid beforehand testified that the meeting would contain “delicate” issues.

”It’s delicate as a result of Kelly is admitting to having intercourse together with his goddaughter for the first time, proper?” Appenteng requested.

“Oh, my god,” Kelly’s protection legal professional Jennifer Bonjean exclaimed.

Judge Harry Leinenweber then sustained an objection earlier than one was even made.

After one other question about the meeting, McDavid leaned again in his chair and stated instantly to Appenteng, “You gotta do better.” He then shortly stated, “I’m sorry for saying that,” clamping a hand over his mouth.

Another sharp trade occurred shortly earlier than the lunch break, when Appenteng requested whether or not it was true that McDavid had hugged a person after he returned a Kelly intercourse tape to him in trade for money. “Huh? No, ma’am,” McDavid stated.

“You have to answer ‘yes’ or ‘no,’ not ‘huh.’” Appenteng stated.

Toward the finish of his direct examination Thursday, McDavid testified that it wasn’t till viewing proof throughout the present federal trial that McDavid noticed issues in a different way.

“For the last three weeks … I’ve learned a lot of things that I had no idea about in 2008,” McDavid stated.

Asked if he wished to consider Kelly’s claims that his accusers had been all liars, McDavid stated, “I absolutely did.” When requested why, his voice began to break.

“Because I loved him and I believed in him,” McDavid stated. “As I stand here today, I’m embarrassed, sad — ”

His answer was reduce off by loud objections from Kelly’s legal professional in addition to prosecutors.

Afternoon Briefing

Afternoon Briefing

Daily

Chicago Tribune editors’ high story picks, delivered to your inbox every afternoon.

On cross-examination Friday, prosecutors asserted McDavid would way back have been conscious of the accusations made by two witnesses who testified at this trial. The two, recognized solely as Tracy and Nia, made claims that Kelly’s staff settled lengthy earlier than this trial. McDavid was even named in a go well with filed by Nia, although McDavid stated he had no reminiscence of that.

Earlier in the trial, jurors had seen excerpts of three movies purporting to present Kelly having sexual contact together with his underage goddaughter, Jane. Defense attorneys haven’t instantly challenged the undeniable fact that Kelly and Jane are depicted on the sexually specific footage.

And prosecutors introduced in depth testimony from Jane that Kelly had sexual contact along with her “innumerable” instances starting when she was simply 14, then pressured her to lie about it.

Kelly, 55, faces an indictment charging him with 13 counts of manufacturing and receiving youngster pornography, engaging minors to interact in felony sexual exercise, and conspiracy to impede justice.

Also charged are McDavid and Milton “June” Brown, who’re accused in an alleged scheme to purchase again incriminating intercourse tapes that had been taken from Kelly’s assortment and to cover years of alleged sexual abuse of underage women.

[email protected]

[email protected]

Back to top button