Homeless courts help people on streets navigate the legal system

Mesa’s Community Court would possibly appear as if every other at first look, with defendants showing one after the other earlier than a choose wearing a black gown.
But a more in-depth take a look at their sentences reveals a key distinction.
On one Wednesday afternoon, Judge John Tatz directs a lady to get a brand new delivery certificates, Social Security card and ID, to attend weekly Alcoholics Anonymous conferences and to remain in common contact along with her “navigator,” or case supervisor. He tells the subsequent individual to enroll in meals stamps and to remain in housing.
Tatz asks everybody who seems in the chamber to think about doing one thing to help the neighborhood earlier than their subsequent court docket date. But nobody leaves right here with a sentence to jail time or a requirement that they pay a price as recompense for crimes that may vary from trespassing and possession of drug paraphernalia to public intoxication.
“They’ll be told by the judge directly, ‘This is not a punitive court,’” stated Stacey Good, an assistant metropolis prosecutor in Mesa. “You’re not here to get in trouble. We’re not trying to punish you. What we want to do is help. We want to provide services and we want to help change your situation.’”

As Arizona’s homeless inhabitants has expanded lately, Mesa’s court docket is one among a rising quantity in the state that’s geared towards rehabilitation quite than punishment, with the final aim of serving to people on the streets transfer extra successfully by the legal justice system.
Each court docket approaches that goal in another way. Some permit people experiencing homelessness to work off fines and costs that accumulate after they’ve been sentenced for against the law, whereas others — like Mesa’s — can dismiss circumstances altogether in trade for participation in the program.
Critics argue that some of these applications are ineffective with out simultaneous adjustments to policing that will deal with the criminalization of people experiencing homelessness. Phoenix police, for instance, are beneath federal investigation for his or her remedy of people residing on the streets.
Low commencement charges present the difficulties this inhabitants can face regardless of navigating courts constructed with them in thoughts. And even sturdy proponents of the courts concede that the applications aren’t a wholesale answer to homelessness.
But for people dealing with the prospect of fines and jail time that would make it tougher to exit the streets or acquire employment, the courts can function a lifeline.
Jennifer Webber, 58, is one among the latest “graduates” of Mesa’s court docket. She had her trespassing quotation dismissed late final year and stated it’s a reduction to not have the prospect of punishment shadowing her as she works to get into extra everlasting housing and make different adjustments in her life after about seven years on the streets.
“Before I started community court, the original sentence was that I could have had 30 days in jail and a $500 fine — and I have no income,” Webber stated outdoors the courtroom, her fingers nonetheless clutching the certificates the choose had handed her simply moments earlier than. “I kind of have stuff I have to go through before I can start working. I still have some things going on, you know?”
‘Do you lock them up?’

Aside from Mesa’s court docket, which has been working since 2018, there’s a similar program in Maricopa County with the capacity to serve eligible defendants throughout the area and a city-specific program in Tucson.
In the previous two years, a minimum of two new courts for people experiencing homelessness have gotten off the floor in Arizona: one in Scottsdale and one other in Chandler. A 3rd is at present beneath improvement in the fast-growing metropolis of Goodyear.
Goodyear’s program is predicted to be the first of its sort in the West Valley, and is beneath improvement at a time when the variety of people experiencing homelessness in the metropolis has soared together with the municipality’s inhabitants. The variety of unsheltered people in the neighborhood ballooned to 23 in 2020 from seven in 2017 — a 228% improve, in response to an annual census rely of the homeless.
In an effort to get forward of the rising problem, metropolis leaders have turned to the homeless court docket idea, with a plan to mannequin their new program — which ought to be up and operating someday later this year — after Mesa’s.
“We see the need to individualize justice,” Mayra Galindo, Goodyear’s presiding municipal court docket choose, stated in explaining the resolution to speculate $300,000 in a court docket for veterans and the homeless. “In a flourishing city like this is — and it’s just growing at a neck break speed — if we do not pour the foundation where we can prepare for the needs of the community as it grows, we’re setting up ourselves for failure.”
While the transfer towards homeless courts in Arizona is comparatively latest, the idea dates to 1989, when the nation’s first homeless court docket opened in San Diego, California, in response to a 2017 report from the National Center for State Courts.
‘The solely factor that issues to him helps people’: An Arizona veteran’s journey from jail time, addiction to helping others
Since then, a minimum of 9 different states round the nation have embraced the mannequin as a part of an effort to handle the limitations people experiencing homelessness typically face when introduced into the court docket system.
Challenges fluctuate, however some people on the streets lack garments that adhere to the conventional decorum necessities of a courtroom or transportation to get to the courthouse in the first place, the Maricopa County Regional Homeless Court notes on its web site. Others face psychological well being challenges that may make it obscure the legal system or might really feel intimidated by the court docket course of.
If they’ll overcome these limitations, they face others.
The fines and costs sometimes imposed in court docket could be insurmountable to some people on the streets, in response to the American Bar Association — particularly if they’re dealing with a number of prices. And unpaid fines can shortly accumulate, making it tougher for people to entry “desperately needed services” like public advantages and psychological well being or substance abuse remedy.
Serving jail time also can make it more durable for people to get into housing or get jobs that may help them turn into extra secure, the affiliation famous in an August decision addressing homeless courts.

As its homeless inhabitants confronted these challenges, Mesa realized just a few years in the past that its current system was failing these on the streets.
“We would see homeless people come through and as prosecutors, we knew they were homeless,” stated City Prosecutor Paul Hawkins. “But it was like, what do you do? If it’s their, like, 15th or 20th case, you know, do you lock them up and when they get out they’re just as homeless as when they went in? Or, do you not do anything and that looks like well, but they’re committing these offenses but you’re not doing anything?”
That’s when the metropolis created its neighborhood court docket, which provides people experiencing homelessness who’ve prices for low-level and non-violent crimes the alternative to get their circumstances dismissed if they comply with take part in providers.
As a part of that course of, defendants are assigned a “navigator,” who meets with them outdoors of the courtroom and may help them acquire wanted identification paperwork, housing vouchers and authorities advantages and discover jobs. Sometimes navigators will even provide somebody a trip to allow them to meet the court docket’s attendance necessities.
Audrey Sanders, a neighborhood navigator with the nonprofit Copa Health, stated she offers people with a “smorgasbord of options and they choose what they would like to do.”
“Obviously, some things are mandated by court, such as substance use treatment and then getting their documents and stuff,” she stated. “But a lot of times they have a lot of other little things that we do. Sometimes it’s even like reconnecting them to family they haven’t spoken to. We just try to basically remove any barriers to them moving forward.”
Defendants come again to court docket a number of instances all through to offer updates on their progress. And when Tatz thinks they’re prepared, he can dismiss their circumstances.
Good stated the program normally takes wherever from six months to a year to finish, a interval throughout which she says defendants have the help they should make actual adjustments.
“When we have somebody that goes through the entire court process, we all see their accomplishments and they get a sense of accomplishment,” she stated. “And you can see it in them and them being proud of themselves and what’s going on in their life. It’s really awesome to see.”
Webber, who spent greater than 18 months working by homeless court docket, stated the course of felt rigorous at instances, and she or he didn’t like the expectation that she needed to come earlier than the choose each month. She additionally apprehensive that she wouldn’t in the end make it by.
“It’s great; I didn’t expect it today,” she stated the day of her commencement. “I kept thinking, man, is this ever going to happen for me?”
But Webber stated the program has general been a constructive drive in her life. During the court docket course of, her navigator helped her get right into a lodge that had been transformed into a brief shelter for the homeless and has additionally been working to help her discover a extra everlasting residing scenario.
‘Steps to find stability’

Not each case that goes by the court docket ends as a hit story, although.
In 2021, Mesa’s court docket added 1,257 people to the docket. Just 114 of them graduated, in response to information supplied by the courts, or a 9% success rate. But of those that graduated, solely seven have up to now returned to Mesa’s neighborhood court docket with new circumstances inside the calendar year.
In 2020 — a year wherein the court docket system confronted vital disruption amid the coronavirus pandemic — there have been 782 people added to neighborhood court docket and 38 of them graduated. That’s a hit rate of about 5%. Just three of these defendants in the end returned to neighborhood court docket inside the year after they graduated from the program.
Tatz stated many defendants are filtered out of Mesa’s program as a result of they both aren’t exhibiting up or haven’t completed what they had been requested to do by the court docket. Some of them aren’t prepared to vary their lives, he stated, so a court docket that’s centered on that aim isn’t going to help them exit homelessness.
“If they’re not ready, we’re not going to (be able to) help them.”
Money options: Phoenix police, homeless providers see $63M spending bump in finances
But those that do graduate are higher off, Tatz says. Many have discovered housing or are in some type of shelter ready for government-subsidized housing to open up. And they’re now not burdened with the concern of fines and jail time for his or her circumstances in Mesa.
“They have taken advantage of the system,” he stated of the program’s graduates. “They’ve either gotten themselves off the streets or they’ve gotten themselves substance abuse treatment, or they got themselves a job and found a place to stay. I mean, they’ve succeeded. That’s why they graduated.”
In Maricopa County’s post-adjudication program — which turns charges and fines which have already been levied towards members of the homeless inhabitants for low-level offenses into neighborhood restitution hours — some 1,780 people experiencing homelessness participated from 2013 to April 2022.
During that point interval, they accomplished practically 623,000 service hours, in response to information supplied by the program. Under the court docket’s guidelines, that may embody something from conventional neighborhood service, like choosing up trash on the freeway, to efforts that “foster the applicant’s path out of homelessness,” like finding out for a GED diploma, taking parenting courses or meeting with a case employee, in response to Karen Sadler, Maricopa County’s regional homeless court docket coordinator.
By the time people graduate, “they have taken a lot of steps to find stability and they’ve done just a lot of work and a lot of community service hours to take care of their fines and fees,” she stated.
‘They might not be able to follow through’

While proponents of homeless courts level to the advantages of serving to this inhabitants higher entry the judicial system, additionally they concede that it’s not an answer to the multifaceted issues that push people onto the streets and preserve them there — from poverty to rising well being care prices and unequal entry to schooling.
And the applications aren’t with out critics.
Elizabeth Venable, an organizer with The Fund for Empowerment, a Phoenix-based group that advocates for the rights of these on the streets, questions the advantages of those courts with out corresponding adjustments to the approach police method the unhoused inhabitants.
The U.S. Justice Department introduced final summer season that it was launching an investigation into the Phoenix Police Department’s remedy of people experiencing homelessness amid complaints that officers had illegally seized people’s property throughout encampment sweeps. The probe, which was anticipated to final greater than a year, can also be investigating the division’s use of drive and claims of discrimination towards people experiencing homelessness.
Police working with people experiencing homelessness are sometimes finishing up insurance policies applied at the metropolis stage — as was the case with the encampment cleanups, which had been unanimously permitted by the Phoenix City Council. The National Low-Income Housing Coalition has discovered that metropolis ordinances focusing on people experiencing homelessness have “dramatically” elevated throughout the United States over the previous couple of years. And many people experiencing homelessness come to court docket on account of citations for these so-called “lifestyle crimes,” like trespassing or loitering.
Until efforts to criminalize people experiencing homelessness finish, Venable argues that homeless court docket applications merely apply a Band-Aid to an issue that originated elsewhere.
“I think many of the charges are illegitimate, so most of them shouldn’t be prosecuted in homeless court,” she stated.
She thinks program funding can be higher spent on housing for people experiencing homelessness and in addition worries that the limitations to going by homeless court docket are too excessive to help many people who want it.
“You have to be extremely compliant, and you only get to do it if you have proven various improvements to your life,” she stated. “That’s very hard.”
Sadler, with the Maricopa County Regional Homeless Court, acknowledged the filtering of circumstances is usually a actual limitation of some of these applications — particularly contemplating the variety of people experiencing homelessness who face psychological sickness.
“We have these certain standards that individuals are going to have to meet,” she stated. “And in some cases, those standards can mean that if it’s an individual who doesn’t have the cognitive or emotional ability to have a relationship with a case manager and to follow up and follow through with those case managers, they might not be able to follow through with our program.”
During the 2020 time limit rely, practically 1,000 people experiencing homelessness in the county self-identified as having a psychological sickness, or about one in eight people residing on the streets.
While advocates for such applications acknowledge that these courts aren’t an answer for homelessness, and that some people will fall by the cracks, proponents nonetheless see their potential to help particular person purchasers change their lives for the higher.

And that’s a hope many people experiencing homelessness share, as properly.
After he attended his first court docket session for a trespassing case in November, Rich Cragle, 47, famous that he has an extended “rap sheet” that features every part from “stealing bikes all the way up to stealing stuff out of a store.” Those court docket circumstances could make life tougher, he stated, for people who’re attempting to enhance their circumstances.
“It gives them a harder life,” he stated. “And not only that, they don’t get better.”
But he was optimistic that this court docket, with its totally different method to justice and its focus on addressing the core challenges that preserve people on the streets, would offer the help he must exit homelessness after practically seven years.
“I hope so. I really do. My belief is I think it will,” he stated outdoors of the courtroom. “They were nice to me and they were really explanatory to me. And I think I’m just going to sit back and see if they can’t help me this time.”
As of late May, Cragle was nonetheless lively in the court docket system and scheduled to look to offer an replace on his progress.
Taylor Stevens, a former reporter at the Salt Lake Tribune, is at present pursuing a grasp’s diploma in investigative journalism at Arizona State University’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.