Hiltzik: For Republicans, ESG is the new critical race theory

In May, Elon Musk went on the warpath towards the funding mannequin recognized by the initials ESG, quick for “environmental, social and governance” ideas.

“ESG is a scam,” Musk, the chief government of electric-car maker Tesla, groused in a tweet. “It has been weaponized by phony social justice warriors.”

Musk was irked that Tesla had been dropped from a Standard & Poor’s ESG index whereas oil company Exxon Mobil remained. But his criticism tied in neatly with a marketing campaign being waged by political conservatives towards ESG, or, as they generally describe it, “woke capitalism.”

Climate threat is funding threat.

— BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, 2020

Red states have been implementing insurance policies aimed toward taking business away from funding managers whose methods ostensibly promote environmental objectives or social activism — say by shunning investments in fossil gasoline or firearms corporations or in corporations with questionable social practices.

Former Vice President Mike Pence positioned the battle towards ESG entrance and middle in his quest for the GOP presidential nomination in 2024. During a speech in Houston in May, Pence attacked the Biden administration for advancing “capricious new ESG regulations that allow left-wing radicals to destroy American energy producers from within.”

Pence’s phrases certainly fell on welcoming ears in Houston, since ESG investing generally targets the oil and fuel trade and the fossil gasoline economic system. For instance, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a right-wing group partially funded by the Koch community, which derives a lot of its wealth from fossil fuels, has promoted a mannequin anti-ESG legislation.

A Texas law passed last year prohibits state companies from investing or doing business with monetary corporations deemed to “boycott” fossil gasoline corporations by “taking any action … intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations” with these corporations.

Texas State Comptroller Glenn Hegar has already begun compiling a listing of boycotting corporations by asking them to reveal their insurance policies on international warming.

In June, West Virginia State Treasurer Riley Moore informed six leading Wall Street firms by letter that that they had been provisionally discovered to be boycotting fossil gasoline corporations, presumably making them ineligible for state contracts. The corporations are BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp and Morgan Stanley.

Goldman Sachs and U.S. Bancorp declined my request for remark. BlackRock hasn’t commented publicly. JPMorgan instructed me it hasn’t but responded to Moore; the deadline for responding is July 10. The different two didn’t reply.

BlackRock, one in every of the world’s largest funding administration corporations, has change into a specific goal for the anti-ESG crowd. In half that’s as a result of BlackRock CEO Larry Fink sounded an early alarm about the funding impression of world warming in his annual letter to corporate CEOs in 2020. “Climate risk is investment risk,” Fink wrote then.

This year, Fink famous that “every company and every industry will be transformed by the transition to a net zero world” (that is, decreasing the emission of greenhouse gases to zero). He added, “the question is, will you lead, or will you be led?”

In response, West Virginia’s Moore introduced that his state would withdraw about $20 million in funds from BlackRock, out of its $8 billion in Treasury investments.

Still, the pushback by states doesn’t exactly match the weight of the oil and fuel trade inside their borders.

You don’t see laws penalizing banks or funding funds for shunning oil and fuel corporations popping out of blue California, which ranks second in the nation in most measures of oil and fuel financial exercise, according to the American Petroleum Institute, or Pennsylvania (third to fifth, relying on the metric), or different top-ten states resembling New York, New Jersey and Illinois.

You see them in pink states resembling Texas, Kentucky and Tennessee. Texas ranks first in the nation in oil and fuel exercise, however the different two aren’t even amongst the prime 15.

In Tennessee, which enacted a law forbidding the state treasurer to do business with a monetary establishment that refuses to finance corporations in the fossil gasoline trade, the oil and fuel trade accounts for about 4% of employment in the state.

That’s an indication that ESG has change into an all-purpose rallying cry in the partisan tradition wars. For Republicans and the proper wing, ESG is the new “critical race theory.” It’s an idea nebulous sufficient to be made to appear offensive or evil.

The time period itself might be weaponized as a catchphrase to rile up the base; insofar as the base has no thought what it even means, a lot the higher.

It’s price noting that state-level assaults on monetary corporations over their purported favoring of ESG points, particularly state legal guidelines aimed toward defending the oil and fuel trade, might be costly.

The 2021 Texas legislation prohibiting municipalities from coping with banks that appeared to have pro-ESG insurance policies led to the exit of 5 main municipal underwriters from the state, according to a study by Daniel Garrett of the University of Pennsylvania and Ivan Ivanov of the Federal Reserve.

They estimated that the curiosity prices for Texas municipalities on $32 billion in borrowing throughout the first eight months after the legislation’s enactment had been greater by as a lot as $532 million.

Conservative assaults on ESG aren’t new. The Trump administration took goal at the idea in 2020, when the Department of Labor tried to restrict the means of retirement account managers to supply account holders choices for socially responsible or sustainable investments. Another Trump initiative aimed to make it tougher for these managers to vote in favor of shareholder resolutions selling ESG objectives.

The Biden administration dropped those rules in March.

This is merely one other iteration of the marketing campaign towards “wokeness,” which appears to be the core of what some Republican officeholders and aspirants have to supply voters.

A great instance is Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has made Walt Disney Co., one in every of his state’s largest employers, a goal of his theatrical wrath as a result of it deigned to criticize Florida’s so-called “Don’t Say Gay” legislation, which discourages instructing in public faculties about gender points.

It’s simple to tar ESG as a left-wing, radical or fringe coverage threatening sober, accountable company managements — by no means thoughts that it has been spreading by way of Wall Street sooner than virtually every other investing idea in current reminiscence.

With ESG investing now accounting for greater than $20 trillion in belongings underneath administration in the U.S. alone, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, or greater than one-third of the whole belongings, ESG is now unmistakably mainstream.

For all that, ESG could be a squishy idea in apply. Deutsche Bank has come underneath investigation by German authorities and Goldman Sachs by the Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly pasting “ESG” labels on funding funds that will not be particularly rigorous about specializing in professional ESG corporations, a apply generally described as “greenwashing.”

The SEC has proposed rules to “promote consistent, comparable, and reliable information for investors concerning funds’ and advisers’ incorporation of environmental, social, and governance factors.” Among different guidelines, the company says, “Funds focused on the consideration of environmental factors generally would be required to disclose the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their portfolio investments.”

The investigations and the SEC proposals suggest that funding corporations try to serve the public’s enthusiasm for socially accountable investing with out doing the laborious work of fashioning portfolios that meet the normal.

Defining what even qualifies as an ESG funding, nonetheless, isn’t simple. The funding world is engaged in a vigorous debate over whether or not fossil gasoline corporations needs to be excluded from ESG portfolios fully, or whether or not it’s correct to put money into some corporations which are attempting to transition from petroleum to renewables however haven’t accomplished the journey.

Environmental and social points usually go hand in hand. Musk’s criticism about S&P’s ESG index ignored the cause Tesla was dropped from the roster: According to S&P, it was due to points associated to accusations of racial discrimination at Tesla and questions on the security of Tesla’s Autopilot driver-assist options.

Exxon stayed on the listing as an artifact of S&P’s difficult trade weighting course of for the index, however didn’t signify S&P’s judgment that the oil company was a beacon of environmental duty.

Not all fossil gasoline corporations reply to ESG initiatives with unalloyed hostility — regardless of Pence’s assertion in his Houston speech that three administrators elected to the board of Exxon Mobil on an ESG platform final year are “now working to undermine the company from the inside.”

In truth, Exxon Mobil has taken steps to placate ESG traders — not least as a result of the three administrators elected final year in the marketing campaign sponsored by the sustainable funding agency Engine No. 1 had been reelected this year. In a one-year retrospective, Engine No. 1 reported that since the unique election “Exxon has taken a multitude of actions to reduce its emissions footprint and has begun to lay the foundations for a viable low-carbon business strategy.”

These initiatives might be seen as undermining fossil gasoline corporations provided that one believes that the oil and fuel trade can be immune into the limitless future from the penalties of world warming and the developed world’s transition to different vitality. As ESG traders perceive, that’s not the option to guess.

Back to top button