A Texas faculty district is dealing with an investigation by the U.S. Department of Education’s (DOE) civil rights office after its superintendent was accused of discriminating towards LGBTQIA+ college students whereas ordering the elimination of sure books from its libraries.
The DOE’s Office for Civil Rights is trying into the Granbury Independent School District, positioned southwest of Fort Worth, under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which bars discrimination on the premise of sexual orientation or gender identification, a DOE spokesperson confirmed Tuesday.
The DOE declined additional remark as a result of ongoing investigation.
News of the investigation, first reported by NBC, ProPublica and the Texas Tribune, follows the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) requesting a federal review of the district, beneath Title IX, again in July after it reportedly removed more than 125 books pending overview for inappropriate content material. Nearly 75% of those books are associated to LGBTQIA+ characters or themes, the ACLU stated.
The ACLU additionally cited feedback made by the faculties’ superintendent to his colleges’ librarians in January that reportedly denied the existence of transgender and non-binary people. A recording of the remarks was obtained by NBC News.
“There are two genders. There’s male, and there’s female. And I acknowledge that there are men that think they’re women, and there are women that think they’re men,” Granbury Superintendent Jeremy Glenn instructed librarians at a district meeting, in keeping with NBC News. “I don’t have any issues with what people want to believe, but there’s no place for it in our libraries.”
Glenn reportedly cited Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s demand in November 2021 that state training officers develop statewide requirements that forestall “pornography” and “other obscene content” from getting into libraries. In addition, Abbott specified two memoirs that characteristic LGBTQIA+ characters and graphic photographs and descriptions of intercourse.
“I think specifically what we’re getting at, let’s call it what it is. And I’m cutting to the chase on a lot of this. It’s the, it’s the transgender, LGBTQ, and the sex — sexuality in books,” Glenn instructed faculty officers. He added that Granbury is a “very, very conservative community,” and those that don’t affirm ought to “hide it.”
The Granbury School District later introduced that its committee of educators and neighborhood members tasked with reviewing the books finally discovered eight books that had been “sexually explicit and not age-appropriate.”
“Two of the eight books did have LGBTQ+ themes, however, all of the books that were removed had sexually explicit and/or pervasively vulgar content,” it said back in March.
A consultant for the college district didn’t instantly reply to HuffPost’s request for remark.
Efforts to ban books have proliferated nationwide over the previous two years, together with threats to librarians.
The American Library Association (ALA) reported in September that the variety of e-book challenges seen through the first eight months of this year almost matched 2021′s complete, which was the best in many years.
“It used to be a parent had learned about a given book and had an issue with it. Now we see campaigns where organizations are compiling lists of books, without necessarily reading or even looking at them,” Deborah Caldwell-Stone, director of the ALA’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, instructed The Associated Press.
ALA President Lessa Kananiʻopua Pelayo-Lozada stated the censoring isn’t about children — it’s about politics.
“Efforts to censor entire categories of books reflecting certain voices and views shows that the moral panic isn’t about kids: it’s about politics,” she stated in a past statement. “Organizations with a political agenda are spreading lists of books they don’t like.”