Crypto News

Cryptocurrency as Money — Store of Value or Medium of Exchange? – Op-Ed Bitcoin News

**The following article was written by Kristoffer Mousten Hansen and Karras Lambert and printed on September 28, 2022. Cryptocurrency as Money — Store of Value or Medium of Exchange? was initially printed on mises.org. The opinions expressed on this article are the authors’ personal. Bitcoin.com isn’t chargeable for or accountable for any opinions, content material, accuracy or high quality inside the op-ed.**


Cryptocurrency lovers typically have a fantastic appreciation for the Austrian college of economics. This is comprehensible since Austrian economists have at all times argued for the advantage of privately produced money outdoors authorities management. Unfortunately, an misguided understanding of the event and features of money has emerged and grow to be more and more dominant amongst a minimum of some proponents of bitcoin — a story that’s at odds with the fundamentals of Austrian financial idea.

In this view, which might maybe be traced to Nick Szabo’s essay emphasizing collectibles, the first and predominant perform of money is as a “store of value,” or this perform is on par with the medium-of-exchange perform. According to this view, a commodity should first “transmit value” over time. It can then be used as a medium of alternate earlier than lastly turning into established as a unit of account.

This account will get the emergence and performance of money backwards: the first and certainly sole important perform of money is as a medium of alternate. Its standing as a “store of value” (extra on this phrase under) is incidental, whereas the perform of unit of account is nonessential, as there have been many money commodities all through historical past that had been by no means used as items of account.

The Austrian custom, from Carl Menger to Ludwig von Mises and Murray Rothbard, has at all times insisted that money is in essence a medium of alternate, with some other so-called features being incidental and, within the case of “store of value,” metaphorical. In what follows, we clarify this position.

On Value

To perceive the character of money, we first evaluation the idea of worth. Austrians have at all times emphasised the subjective nature of worth. It isn’t one thing intrinsic to items however at all times relative to the performing particular person and his potential decisions. At the second of selection, he confers worth on an object by preferring it to different objects. An object may be valued both for its usefulness in straight reaching the performing particular person’s finish (as a client good), for aiding the manufacturing of client items (as a producer good), or as a medium of alternate.

The key level is that worth is a subjective notion and is simply significant in a selection scenario. Subjective worth can’t be transmitted throughout time, and due to this fact there isn’t any such factor as a “store of value” in a literal sense. A factor can of course be saved for later use, however its worth can’t be saved in the identical means that its bodily integrity may be preserved. At any given time, nonetheless, subjective worth performs the central function within the formation of market alternate charges, i.e., costs.

An alternate solely ever takes place when the exchanging events each favor what the opposite has greater than what they provide up in return. In a financial economic system, most exchanges are between money and nonmoney items and providers, however the identical precept of reverse desire rankings holds true: the vendor of a great prefers the sum of money he receives to the great and the customer prefers the great to the sum of money he should give up for it.

In a society with persistently repeated exchanges, an built-in system of market costs is established. A factor’s market worth is then the identical as its market worth. To name one thing a “store of value” is known as a strategy to say that its market worth is predicted to stay the identical or improve over time. The distinction between money and different items is that the market worth of money can’t be expressed as a single worth however should be expressed as an entire vary of costs. This vary of costs is the buying energy of money. When we communicate of money as a retailer of worth, we actually imply that we anticipate it to have a steady or growing buying energy with respect to all different items.

On Money

A key argument of the “store of value” proponents is that money is the great that finest served as a retailer of worth and due to this fact steadily emerged as the commonest medium of alternate. This concept has little or no to do with Menger’s account of the origin of money. It isn’t one of the best retailer of worth that emerges as money however probably the most marketable good.

The motion from direct to oblique alternate develops as market actors uncover that items differ in how extensively demanded they’re and start to alternate their items for extra extensively demanded — extra marketable — items as a substitute of participating in direct barter. A number of items steadily grow to be dominant media of alternate primarily based on the traits that make them helpful for this goal: excessive worth per unit weight/quantity, divisibility, sturdiness, transportability. The treasured metals had been till the 20 th century used as money exactly as a result of their qualities made them probably the most appropriate commodities for the aim.

Notice that there’s been no point out of money being a retailer of worth on this dialogue of Menger’s idea of money to date. In truth, he explicitly argued that it was fallacious to attribute to money qua money the perform of retailer of worth:

But the notion that attributes to money as such the perform of additionally transferring ‘values’ from the current into the long run should be designated as misguided. Although metallic money, as a result of of its sturdiness and low value of preservation, is likely appropriate for this goal additionally, it’s nonetheless clear that different commodities are nonetheless higher suited to it. Indeed, expertise teaches that wherever much less simply preserved items fairly than the dear metals have attained money-character, they ordinarily serve for functions of circulation, however not for the preservation of ‘values.’

That the financial metals are additionally good shops of worth is simply an unintentional characteristic; it isn’t important to their financial perform. Qualities that make a commodity a so-called retailer of worth are more likely to additionally make it a great medium of alternate. Thus, sturdiness is vital for any financial commodity, and it’s clearly important for something to be a “store of value” for any size of time.

In truth, as Mises explained, the perform of retailer of worth, insofar as it may be mentioned to exist for a sure money commodity, is embedded within the commodity’s major perform as a medium of alternate: “Money is the thing which serves as the generally accepted and commonly used medium of exchange. This is its only function. All the other functions which people ascribe to money are merely particular aspects of its primary and sole function, that of a medium of exchange.”

We needn’t get right into a deeper dialogue of the demand for money — it’s apparent, as Mises goes on to say within the chapter simply cited, that folks preserve a reserve of money, and that each one money is at all times held by somebody someplace. This too, nonetheless, doesn’t point out that money essentially serves as a “store of value.” As William H. Hutt defined in a classic article (later elaborated by Hans-Hermann Hoppe), money’s use in an individual’s money steadiness is as a reserve of buying energy in opposition to unexpected contingencies.

We preserve money readily available for emergencies or to avail ourselves of unexpected worthwhile alternatives. But even unhealthy money — i.e., money declining in buying energy and which due to this fact can’t meaningfully be mentioned to be a “store of value” — serves this goal. Holding money merely means holding on to it till the day within the unsure future once you anticipate it is possible for you to to alternate it for one thing you worth extra.

Final Thoughts

Bitcoin lovers who align with the Austrian college of Menger, Mises, and Rothbard err after they ascribe basic significance to the “store of value” perform of money on the expense of the “medium of exchange” perform, the latter of which is the one important side of money. Likewise, downplaying the significance of lively utilization of cryptocurrency, which additionally entails elevated business demand, in favor of a “HODL forever” mentality, goes in opposition to Mises’s recognition that “business usage alone can transform a commodity into a common medium of exchange.”

Tags on this story
austrian, Austrian Economics, Austrian School, Carl Menger, debate, economics, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Karras Lambert, Kristoffer Mousten Hansen, Ludwig von Mises, Mises, money, Precious Metals, retailer of worth, subjective worth, idea of money, idea of worth, Unit of Exchange

What are your ideas on cryptocurrency as money and the frequent store-of-value vs. medium-of-exchange debate? Be certain to tell us within the feedback part under.

Guest Author

This is an Op-ed article. The opinions expressed on this article are the writer’s personal. Bitcoin.com doesn’t endorse nor assist views, opinions or conclusions drawn on this submit. Bitcoin.com isn’t chargeable for or accountable for any content material, accuracy or high quality inside the Op-ed article. Readers ought to do their very own due diligence earlier than taking any actions associated to the content material. Bitcoin.com isn’t accountable, straight or not directly, for any harm or loss brought on or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to the use of or reliance on any data on this Op-ed article.
To contribute to our Op-ed part ship a suggestion to op-ed (at) bitcoin.com.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational functions solely. It isn’t a direct provide or solicitation of a proposal to purchase or promote, or a suggestion or endorsement of any merchandise, providers, or firms. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the company nor the writer is accountable, straight or not directly, for any harm or loss brought on or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to the use of or reliance on any content material, items or providers talked about on this article.

Back to top button