Columbia Won’t Participate in the Next U.S. News Rankings

Columbia University is not going to take part in the subsequent U.S. News & World Report rankings of faculties throughout the nation, after a Columbia math professor questioned the accuracy of the knowledge that secured its No. 2 spot in the influential rankings, the college introduced on Thursday evening.

The deadline to submit knowledge for the rankings is Friday, and a college spokesman mentioned officers wanted extra time to investigate the knowledge and tackle the criticisms raised by the professor, Michael Thaddeus.

In a 21-page stinging critique Dr. Thaddeus posted on his web site in February, he not solely challenged the knowledge behind the ranking however added gas to the debate over whether or not faculty rankings — utilized by thousands and thousands of potential faculty college students and their dad and mom — are beneficial and even correct.

“Columbia leaders take these questions seriously, and we immediately embarked on a review of our data collection and submissions process,” Columbia’s provost, Mary C. Boyce, mentioned in the announcement.

At the time, Columbia stood by its knowledge, however Dr. Boyce mentioned the college was “now closely reviewing our processes in light of the questions raised.”

“The ongoing review is a matter of integrity,” she continued. “We will take no shortcuts in getting it right.”

A spokesman for Columbia, Ben Chang, mentioned he didn’t wish to speculate about when Columbia would once more take part in the rankings.

For an Ivy League faculty like Columbia to withdraw from the rankings, even quickly, is a blow to their popularity and will spur different universities to rethink their participation as nicely. Many faculty presidents complain that the rankings pressure them to emphasise statistics that oversimplify what it takes to discover a good match between a pupil and a faculty.

Dr. Thaddeus mentioned on Thursday evening that the transfer raised a bunch of questions that Columbia had not but answered.

“Is the university expressing its disapproval of the U.S. News rankings themselves?” he wrote in an electronic mail. “Will it withdraw in future years as well? Why can’t the work be completed? What was it about the questions I raised that, apparently, derailed the process?”

The college had not made “any substantive responses to the concrete issues I brought up,” he added.

In Dr. Thaddeus’s critique, he cited proof he gathered that steered Columbia had made its undergraduate lessons look smaller, its instruction spending look higher and its professors look extra extremely educated.

The subsequent version of the rankings is scheduled to return out in September, officers mentioned. To assist potential college students navigate with out it, Dr. Boyce mentioned Columbia deliberate in the fall to publish a Common Data Set, a loosely standardized set of statistics utilized by greater academic establishments. She mentioned it could embody a lot of the similar info that’s included in the U.S. News profiles.

Dr. Thaddeus mentioned he understood that Columbia had ready such knowledge units in the previous for its personal inner use however didn’t make them public.

“The point is that they have documents that would shed light on their past submissions to U.S. News — and might even reveal whether their misrepresentations were intentional or unintentional — but they refuse to make them public, even after an overwhelming majority of the faculty who voted asked them to do so,” he mentioned.

Mr. Chang, the spokesman, declined to touch upon Dr. Thaddeus’s remarks about the Common Data Set however famous Columbia’s pledge to publish a knowledge set this fall. “The university has long conducted what it believed to be a thorough process,” he mentioned. “Our goal is maximum accuracy and transparency.”

Critics have mentioned that the U.S. News components tends to reward colleges based mostly on wealth and popularity.

In his evaluation, Dr. Thaddeus, who specializes in algebraic geometry, discovered that key supporting knowledge submitted by Columbia was “inaccurate, dubious or highly misleading.”

This year, Columbia rose one spot in the rankings to No. 2; the college was surpassed solely by Princeton and tied with Harvard and M.I.T.

Dr. Thaddeus famous that Columbia was ranked 18th in 1988, an increase that he steered was exceptional. “Why have Columbia’s fortunes improved so dramatically?” he requested in his evaluation.

Columbia will not be the first college to have its rankings knowledge questioned.

This year the University of Southern California pulled its education school out of the U.S. News rankings due to inaccuracies in knowledge that went again 5 years. And a former dean of Temple University’s business faculty was discovered responsible final year of utilizing fraudulent knowledge between 2014 and 2018 to enhance the faculty’s nationwide rankings and enhance income. The faculty’s on-line M.B.A. program was ranked greatest in the nation by U.S. News & World Report in the years that he falsified knowledge.

Over the years, different colleges like Iona College, Claremont McKenna College and Emory University have been discovered to have falsified or manipulated knowledge.

Exit mobile version