California lawmakers revised facets of their plan to fast-track power vegetation, soothing some criticism however elevating a brand new one.
CALIFORNIA, USA — This story was initially printed by CalMatters.
The expansive energy bill that so angered clean-energy advocates and metropolis and county officers — negotiated final week behind closed-doors — was softened considerably over the weekend, restoring oversight of recent vitality initiatives to some important state businesses.
But these hard-won concessions had been practically negated late Sunday night time as Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration added a wholly new and sudden part. It reopened the heated debate over the trailer bill, meant, partly, to prop up California’s overstretched power grid.
While the invoice’s earlier model enormously expanded the authority of the state’s Energy Commission to web site and rapidly approve electrical power initiatives, the brand new language does the identical for the state Department of Water Resources. It would put the company squarely within the vitality business, giving it authority not solely to purchase power on the vitality market, which it already does, but additionally to “construct, own and operate” power vegetation.
The new part of the invoice fails to reflect the accountability and compliance modifications to different facets of the laws, made after intense strain. Those modifications embody a requirement for public conferences and a task for native planning businesses to touch upon, however nonetheless don’t have any authority over, power initiatives.
In addition, businesses such because the California Coastal Commission, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the State Lands Commission, state and regional water boards and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, and regional air boards regained their jurisdiction or oversight over facets of the Energy Commission’s choices.
The newest provision, which required writing a brand new part into the California Water Code, would take away jurisdiction of practically all state and native businesses from the method and it could not require compliance with present state or native environmental legal guidelines. The proposed legislation would give the water company broad prerogative to assemble and function power services wherever it chooses, together with delicate coastal areas underneath the jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission.
The price range units apart some $700 million to the Department of Water Resources to facilitate this new authority.
Advocates for renewable vitality and state and native governments had been caught without warning by the modifications, which solely got here to gentle because the invoice was printed late Sunday night time. Today they had been important of the inconsistency: “repairing” one side of the laws to tighten environmental oversight and protect public inclusion in vitality growth choices, however then including new provisions carrying none of these necessities for accountability or transparency.
“It’s a massive shift, a game-changer,” stated Kim Delfino, an environmental marketing consultant. “This is a carte blanche approach — you can do this and you are not accountable to anyone. No daylight, no discussion. This was too massive a policy decision to be kept behind closed doors.”
Overall, the proposed laws is a broad try and streamline approval of photo voltaic, wind and geothermal initiatives, whereas scaling again reliance on fossil fuels.
But the state’s coverage would lengthen use of some natural-gas power vegetation, which are actually scheduled to start going offline next year. State officers already had delayed the closures by three years.
The laws makes an attempt to deal with the reliability of California’s power provide throughout excessive climate and wildfires, suggesting that renewable vitality sources should not but ample to maintain the lights on. But counting on getting old fossil gasoline vegetation is hardly a assure — plenty of gas plants failed throughout final summer time’s warmth wave.
The invoice might allocate billions to fossil gasoline power sources, together with to retrofit extremely polluting diesel backup turbines and hold fuel power vegetation in operation. Those strikes seem to backpedal on California’s pledge to wring carbon from the state’s power grid within the coming a long time in an effort to battle local weather change.
“This budget agreement kicks the can down the road in the climate fight,” stated Mike Young, political director of California Environmental Voters, in a press release. “The energy trailer bill sets a dangerous precedent and could undermine the state’s ultimate goal of building a clean, reliable electric grid that provides power to every community that needs it.”
WATCH RELATED: Inside a wind farm producing renewable vitality for San Diego County (Jun 20, 2022)