2 women sue Apple, alleging stalkers used AirTags to track them

Two women are suing Apple over their exes’ use of AirTags to secretly track their actions and whereabouts in real-time. 

The quarter-sized bluetooth units, which the technology company rolled out in April of 2021, are marketed as instruments that may be used to hint the placement of householders’ personal objects. But since their industrial launch, folks have complained the $29 tags are straightforward to misuse and allow stalkers to hold tabs on their victims

The two women, recognized as Lauren Hughes and “Jane Doe,” accuse Apple of negligently releasing a harmful gadget, minimizing considerations about threats surrounding AirTags and misrepresenting the security of the product by calling them “Stalker-Proof.”

AirTags have “revolutionized the scope, breadth, and ease of location-based stalking,” the go well with claims.

Apple didn’t instantly reply to a request for touch upon the lawsuit. 

“Weapon of choice of stalkers”

“With a price point of just $29, it has become the weapon of choice of stalkers and abusers,” the go well with alleges. 

Hughes, of Travis County, Texas, stated she was stalked by an ex-boyfriend who tracked her utilizing AirTags after the three-month-long relationship ended. After her alleged stalker left objects at her residence, she determined to transfer and quickly relocated to a resort, the place she obtained a notification on her iPhone that an unknown AirTag had been monitoring her. 

Hughes later found that her stalker had hooked up a disguised AirTag to one in all her automotive’s tires, in accordance to the criticism, which was filed in federal district court docket in California. The gadget had been coloured with a sharpie and wrapped in plastic. Apple retailer workers couldn’t inform Hughes how lengthy the gadget had been hooked up to her car, the go well with claims.

Hughes later moved to a brand new residence, and social media posts made by her ex point out that he had adopted her there, too, in accordance to the go well with.

The second plaintiff alleged her former partner used an AirTag to comply with her actions by putting the gadget of their kid’s backpack. After she tried to disable the primary AirTag, one other one confirmed up, in accordance to the criticism.

Apple AirTags spark security and privateness considerations


Apple in February up to date the security and privateness options for AirTags following a number of experiences of stalking. 

“AirTag was designed to help people locate their personal belongings, not to track people or another person’s property, and we condemn in the strongest possible terms any malicious use of our products,” Apple stated in an announcement on the time. 

The up to date measures embody an alert that notifies customers organising an AirTag that stalking is against the law and that legislation enforcement can entry AirTag homeowners’ personal data. 

To make sure, AirTag customers additionally depend on the units for his or her meant functions like monitoring one’s checked baggage when flying

Back to top button